RESEARCH · PROGRAM ANALYSIS · September 7, 2026 · Policy research · 7 min
SHARE and the case for household infrastructure.
A new California program connects grid investment to household equipment. Hawaiʻi can adapt its financing logic while setting its own requirements for access, measured delivery, customer control, and accountability.

Evidence and implementation
From a program announcement to a Hawaiʻi implementation model
Evidence reviewed September 7, 2026. SHARE provides a useful institutional case study. Its announcement does not establish operating performance or a commitment to fund projects in Hawaiʻi.
Evidence reviewed September 7, 2026
What has been announced
Evidence & PMF analysisProgram announcement · source context
PG&E, Rewiring America, and Google announced SHARE on September 3, 2026. PG&E says Google fully funds customer incentives, technology deployment, and program delivery. The program combines coordination of nearly 21,000 existing devices with new equipment offers. That figure describes devices, not homes. The launch includes a Carrier battery-enabled heat-pump offering. These are announced commitments, not independently audited public benefits or demonstrated capacity results.
Sources: SHARE launch announcement (PG&E)
Program announcement · source context
Rewiring America separately describes a target of nearly 500 additional households receiving upgrades. This is a deployment target, not a count of completed installations.
Sources: Homegrown Energy California launch (Rewiring America)
PMF recommendation
PMF recommends evaluating these two activities separately. Enrollment of existing equipment tests coordination; new installations test procurement, installation, and customer economics. Combining their counts would obscure which intervention produces each claimed benefit.
The customer offer needs its own review
Published termsThe published SHARE offer is a discount, not a complete installed price. The FAQ describes Carrier ownership of the battery and potential repayment on early exit. The following is a September 7 snapshot; eligibility and the signed agreement govern.
Sources: SHARE offer, eligibility and FAQ (Rewiring America)
| Customer question | Published term or unresolved point |
|---|---|
| What is the discount? | $5,000; $10,000 for the first 25 households. |
| Who can apply? | Qualifying owner-occupants at eligible Alameda and Santa Clara addresses; central A/C and other restrictions apply. |
| Existing solar or battery? | The launch offer excludes rooftop solar, whole-home batteries, and conflicting demand-response enrollment. |
| Who owns the battery? | Carrier. Early departure may trigger repayment; review the agreement before accepting. |
| Are savings guaranteed? | No. The offer does not establish a final installed cost. |
| What remains unverified? | Battery kWh, physical architecture, and complete customer override and dispatch terms. |
Purchase a public service through useful household equipment
PMF recommendationPMF recommends adapting the underlying transaction: an entity needing grid services helps finance useful equipment hosted by customers. Its contribution should purchase a defined service at a justified price. It should not buy unlimited control of a household or an exemption from the utility planning process.
A Hawaiʻi program should solicit competing equipment and finance portfolios by island and location. Sponsors could support installation or availability payments under published terms. Procurement should disclose the sponsor’s obligations if its own project is delayed or abandoned. Neither customers nor remaining ratepayers should inherit that commercial risk by default.
Make three obligations visible in one customer offer
PMF recommendationPMF recommends a coordinated customer offer with three identifiable contracts. Installation and maintenance establish equipment quality and repair responsibility. Finance or service terms establish ownership, charges, transfer, and exit. Grid-service terms establish dispatch, reserve energy, data use, and compensation. The administrator should identify the responsible counterparty for every obligation.
This separation matters when something fails. A broken compressor should trigger repair, not a dispatch penalty. An aggregator’s communications outage should not increase a household’s debt. A sponsor’s withdrawal should activate a program reserve or replacement arrangement. Consumers need one effective complaint channel even when several firms provide the service.
Publish the evidence needed to judge replication
PMF recommendationPMF recommends an evaluation plan before enrollment. Record quoted and final installation costs, time to commission, customer charges, equipment failures, and service complaints. Test dispatch over specified intervals and report delivered power, usable energy, overrides, and recovery. Household bill outcomes require a stated weather and occupancy adjustment method, with uncertainty reported.
A program should publish aggregate unsuccessful outcomes alongside successes. Enrollment totals and promotional satisfaction statements cannot establish dependable capacity. Independent evaluators should have access to auditable records under privacy controls, and public reporting should explain which observations are measured, modeled, or still unavailable.
Use a bounded pilot to establish the local offer
PMF recommendationPMF recommends starting with a defined service area, a qualified installer network, and an independently approved customer agreement. Include rental and multifamily pathways through separate consent and ownership arrangements. California launch exclusions should not become automatic Hawaiʻi eligibility rules; each exclusion should have a documented technical or administrative reason.
Expansion should require evidence that equipment is maintainable locally, monthly costs remain affordable, and contracted grid services survive ordinary failures. A successful pilot earns the next procurement tranche. It does not establish that every feeder, building type, or customer will produce the same result.